<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Affiliates | Technology | SEO | Mearo.co.uk</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mearo.co.uk/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mearo.co.uk</link>
	<description>A blog about technology, affiliates and SEO</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:48:41 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Micropayments &#8211; A New Revenue Model? by Matt B</title>
		<link>http://www.mearo.co.uk/2009/05/micropayments-a-new-revenue-model/comment-page-1/#comment-3249</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2009 13:48:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mearo.co.uk/?p=105#comment-3249</guid>
		<description>Another interesting point here is how businesses will actually track site usage and arrive at their billing totals.  Who will be given the task of tracking usage?  Would users trust a company&#039;s internal system?  I don&#039;t think I would!  And if not, which 3rd party business is going to pick this up instead?  Given the discrepancies different platforms - decisions like this are pretty huge, especially for the user!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another interesting point here is how businesses will actually track site usage and arrive at their billing totals.  Who will be given the task of tracking usage?  Would users trust a company&#8217;s internal system?  I don&#8217;t think I would!  And if not, which 3rd party business is going to pick this up instead?  Given the discrepancies different platforms &#8211; decisions like this are pretty huge, especially for the user!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Battle For The Single Web Identity by The Boak</title>
		<link>http://www.mearo.co.uk/2009/03/the-battle-for-the-single-web-identity/comment-page-1/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>The Boak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mearo.co.uk/?p=83#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Interesting points - I agree in the main.  However, one key issue that you&#039;ve missed out is security.  Tying multiple access points in one solution means that if the login details become compromised for that one central login, there&#039;s an awful lot of data available to the would-be hacker.  IT Pros are the early adopters in these areas, and tend to lead a lot of web behaviours.  Security is a key concern for them, and until multi-layered protection can be built in, they&#039;re unlikely to go for it en masse.  Unfortunately, multi-layered protection means re-submission of details for different areas, which means we&#039;re back to square one.  Perhaps the answer is security where users can tailor their own settings i.e. access to certain logins with one password, then others with another...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points &#8211; I agree in the main.  However, one key issue that you&#8217;ve missed out is security.  Tying multiple access points in one solution means that if the login details become compromised for that one central login, there&#8217;s an awful lot of data available to the would-be hacker.  IT Pros are the early adopters in these areas, and tend to lead a lot of web behaviours.  Security is a key concern for them, and until multi-layered protection can be built in, they&#8217;re unlikely to go for it en masse.  Unfortunately, multi-layered protection means re-submission of details for different areas, which means we&#8217;re back to square one.  Perhaps the answer is security where users can tailor their own settings i.e. access to certain logins with one password, then others with another&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Real-Time Web by Show Me The Money! How To Monetise Twitter</title>
		<link>http://www.mearo.co.uk/2009/02/the-real-time-web/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Show Me The Money! How To Monetise Twitter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:17:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://mearo.co.uk/?p=10#comment-4</guid>
		<description>[...] and analytics on what people are saying about them, on Twitter, in realtime. Check out my post on the real time web.  This is along the lines of the TechCrunch article, mining the thought stream. Likelihood = 2 [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and analytics on what people are saying about them, on Twitter, in realtime. Check out my post on the real time web.  This is along the lines of the TechCrunch article, mining the thought stream. Likelihood = 2 [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
