<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Battle For The Single Web Identity</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mearo.co.uk/2009/03/the-battle-for-the-single-web-identity/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mearo.co.uk/2009/03/the-battle-for-the-single-web-identity/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Jan 2011 05:11:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Boak</title>
		<link>http://www.mearo.co.uk/2009/03/the-battle-for-the-single-web-identity/#comment-210</link>
		<dc:creator>The Boak</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:24:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mearo.co.uk/?p=83#comment-210</guid>
		<description>Interesting points - I agree in the main.  However, one key issue that you&#039;ve missed out is security.  Tying multiple access points in one solution means that if the login details become compromised for that one central login, there&#039;s an awful lot of data available to the would-be hacker.  IT Pros are the early adopters in these areas, and tend to lead a lot of web behaviours.  Security is a key concern for them, and until multi-layered protection can be built in, they&#039;re unlikely to go for it en masse.  Unfortunately, multi-layered protection means re-submission of details for different areas, which means we&#039;re back to square one.  Perhaps the answer is security where users can tailor their own settings i.e. access to certain logins with one password, then others with another...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting points &#8211; I agree in the main.  However, one key issue that you&#8217;ve missed out is security.  Tying multiple access points in one solution means that if the login details become compromised for that one central login, there&#8217;s an awful lot of data available to the would-be hacker.  IT Pros are the early adopters in these areas, and tend to lead a lot of web behaviours.  Security is a key concern for them, and until multi-layered protection can be built in, they&#8217;re unlikely to go for it en masse.  Unfortunately, multi-layered protection means re-submission of details for different areas, which means we&#8217;re back to square one.  Perhaps the answer is security where users can tailor their own settings i.e. access to certain logins with one password, then others with another&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/


Served from: www.mearo.co.uk @ 2012-02-05 20:19:59 -->
